Tuesday, July 21, 2015

Word: criticaster





criticaster

[krit-i-kas-ter]
noun
1. an incompetent critic.

*******************************************
Janet reread the small article in the newspaper.  She simply couldn’t believe what she was reading.  It just didn’t make any sense to her.
                “This is unbelievable.”  She said, putting the paper down on the table.
                “What is?”  Asked her husband, Dave.
                “This drama critic in the paper.  You remember that play we went to last night?”  Dave nodded, “Well this guy said it was bad.  Not just bad, he said it was terrible.  I think the word garbage was used several times.  He thought the acting was uninspired, the music was bad, and the plot was trite and predictable.”
                “What?  Let me see that.”  Dave said.  He grabbed the paper and read the review.  “Wow.  This guy’s way off.  That was a great show.”
                “I wonder if this guy was watching a different show than we were.”
                “Can’t be.  The review had to have been written at least two or three days ago, and it says the name of the show and the theater.  It’s all the same.”
                “Well then, this guy’s an idiot.”  Janet said.  “Maybe we should write to the paper and ask that they get rid of that guy.”
                “Let’s not be rash here.”  Dave replied.  “Maybe he was just having a bad day, or he has a personal dislike for someone involved with the show.  Hang on, let me check this guy out.”
                Dave went and retrieved is laptop.  Once everything was set up, he searched for the critic in question.  It didn’t take long to find the guy, but he did take some time to read up on him.
                “Oh.  Oh wow.”  He said after a few minutes.
                “What?  What’s wrong?”  Janet asked.
                “This guy’s nuts.  Everything he reviews is bad.  I mean it.  It doesn’t look like he’s ever given a good review in his career.  It doesn’t matter what other people say, or what he’s reviewing, it’s always negative.”
                “Okay, yeah, like I said, he’s an idiot.”
                “No, I don’t think that’s quite correct.  He writes well, and he seems smart enough from what I can tell.  I think he’s just bad at his job.  Either that, or he’s just a hurtful, spiteful human being.”
                “Great.  So people are getting their info from a critic that is either completely incompetent, or just hates everything?  No wonder people think the arts are dead in this town.  Do people at least know how awful this guy is?”  Janet asked.  Dave spent a few more minutes searching. 
                Well, since he only writes two or three reviews in each publication, I’d say that’s a fair bet.  He just doesn’t give up though.  From what I can tell, he’s written for at least a dozen newspapers all over the country.  It doesn’t seem like they keep him around for very long, that’s for sure.”
                “Well, at least that’s something.  Hopefully our paper is smart enough to get rid of this guy for someone who actually knows how to do his job.”
                “We can only hope.”  Dave said, nodding in agreement.  “Otherwise there might be something to it when people say the arts are dead.”
************************************
It's amazing how we let critics color our views on something, isn't it?  If something gets a bad review, people seeing it will inevitably tend to see the bad things, while the opposite tends to be true for good reviews.  Maybe people should try reading a review of something after they've seen it?  Of course, that would defeat the purpose of a critic, wouldn't it?  

No comments:

Post a Comment